A difference between front-loaded streptokinase and standard-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in preserving left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction (the Central Illinois Thrombolytic Therapy Study)

Abstract

A blinded, randomized trial compared the effects of front-loaded streptokinase with those of the conventional dose of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) on left ventricular (LV) function after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Thrombolytic therapy was administered in the emergency departments of 30 community hospitals in central Illinois, and subsequent studies were performed at 1 tertiary referral center. Patients aged ⪯75 years with a first AMI who could be treated within 4 hours of the onset of chest pain were randomly assigned to receive either streptokinase (375,000 111 bolus, followed by 1,125,000 IU over 1 hour) or rt-PA (10 mg bolus, followed by 50 mg in the first hour, and 20 mg/hour for the next 2 hours). All patients were treated with aspirin (325 mg) and intravenous heparin. Patients were transferred for angiography within 24 hours. During the 30-month study, 253 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy 2.4 ± 1.0 hour after the onset of AMI. In patients with anterior wall AMI (n = 90), global LV ejection fraction measured by angiography within 24 hours was 45 ± 12% with rt-PA, and 39 ± 13% with streptokinase (p < 0.03). Convalescent radionuclide angiography documented a persistent beneficial effect of rt-PA on LV regional wall contractility, but not global ejection fraction. There were no differences between rt-PA and streptokinase in preserving global or regional LV function in patients with inferior wall AMI.