Abstract

Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of clinically common single markers and combinations to distinguish nonmetastatic breast cancer and benign breast tumor. A predictive model with a better diagnostic ability for nonmetastatic breast cancer was established by using the diagnostic process. Methods A total of 222 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer and 265 patients with benign breast disease were enrolled in this study. CEA, Ca 15-3, Ca 125, Ca 72-4, CYFRA 21-1, FERR, AFP, and NSE were measured by an electrochemiluminescent immunoenzymometric assay on the Elecsys system. There are four key steps for our diagnostic workflow, that is, feature selection, algorithm selection, parameter optimization, and outer test data was used to validate the optimal algorithm and markers. Results CEA, Ca 15-3, CYFRA 21-1, AFP, and FERR were selected using the t-test in our inner development set. The optimal algorithm among logical regression, decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, and gradient boost machine was selected by 10-fold cross-validation, and we found that random forest and logistic regression are the better classification. The outer test data was used to validate the best markers and classification. The random forest with CEA, Ca 15-3, CYFRA 21-1, AFP, and FERR showed the optimal combination for distinguishing breast cancer and benign breast disease. The AUC value was 0.888, the cut-off point was 0.484, and sensitivity and specificity were 78.9% and 90.1%. Conclusions No single marker of these eight markers was good at identifying nonmetastatic breast cancer from benign tumors. But a diagnostic analysis workflow was established to develop a predictive model with better diagnostic capability for nonmetastatic breast cancer. This workflow is also applicable to the optimization of other disease markers and diagnostic models. The predictive model showed good diagnostic performance, and it could be gradually incorporated as a support method for the diagnosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is by far the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women with an incidence of 11.6% and overall cancer mortality of 6.6% worldwide [1]. ere were an estimated 2.0 million new cases (24.2% of all cancers in women) and 0.6 million cancer deaths (15.0% of all cancer deaths in women) in 2018 [1]

  • A total of 222 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer and 265 patients with benign breast disease were enrolled in our study

  • For the clinical staging of breast cancer, Ca 15–3 levels were higher in stage III than that in stage I and stages 0-II, Table 1: Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer in development set and validation set

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is by far the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women with an incidence of 11.6% and overall cancer mortality of 6.6% worldwide [1]. ere were an estimated 2.0 million new cases (24.2% of all cancers in women) and 0.6 million cancer deaths (15.0% of all cancer deaths in women) in 2018 [1]. Breast cancer is by far the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women with an incidence of 11.6% and overall cancer mortality of 6.6% worldwide [1]. Diagnosis plays an important role in optimizing treatments and reducing the mortality of breast cancer patients [2]. Screening of early breast cancer forms part of the state programme of routine annual or biannual ultrasonography or mammograms for women within a certain age range [3], in China, between 40 and 70 years old. Ultrasonography is used for the early diagnosis of breast cancer in China. 20% of breast cancer patients cannot be diagnosed [5]. Erefore, a complementary instrument is required to get better results for the early diagnosis of breast cancer Approx. 20% of breast cancer patients cannot be diagnosed [5]. erefore, a complementary instrument is required to get better results for the early diagnosis of breast cancer

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call