A Detailed Comparison of the Functional Outcome After Midforearm Replantations Versus Midforearm Transplantation

Abstract

Objectives The functional outcome after midforearm transplantation (HT) is believed to be similar to the outcome after replantation. However, the few existing reports comparing functional outcomes are based on amputations at the level of the distal forearm. This report provides a comparative analysis of the functional results after midforearm replantation (HR) versus HT. Materials and Methods Transplantation of a dominant right forearm performed in a 32-year-old man was compared to the outcomes after five dominant (right) forearm replantations (four men and one woman) in patients ranging from 22 to 38 years of age. Cold ischemia time ranged from 6 to 12.5 hours in all cases. We used similar operative technique and rehabilitation protocol. At 26 (±2) months after replantation/transplantation, we recorded, bony union (x-ray), arterial flow (ultrasonography), range of motion, grip strength, sensation (2 PD Weisensten's filaments), quality of life (DASH, 30–150 points), general evaluation of function according to Chen's or the IRHCTT scoring system. Results A complication of wound infection was observed in one HR patient; Marginal skin necrosis accompanied by prolonged wound healing, in one HT patient. Unification of bones was achieved faster after forearm replantation when compared with transplantation. Grip strength was 17% greater after replantation, but ranges of motion were comparable in both groups. Sensitivity was superior after forearm transplantation (2 PD 15 mm) and overall patient satisfaction was comparable (90 points of DASH questionnaire for HR versus 108 points for HT patients). None of the patients returned to their previous occupations. Conclusion The functional outcome after HT was comparable, and in some respects superior, to the outcome after replantation performed at the midforearm level.