Abstract
This paper provides the results of a descriptive study of the socially responsible mutual funds currently existing in the U.S.A. Managers of these funds employ very similar procedures for evaluating firms with social criteria, although there was no one social criterion used unanimously. Sources of social information used varied widely from fund to fund with data provided by firms being the most frequently used. Managers believe a higher priority should be given to requiring public disclosure of data already being produced for limited distribution, e.g. EEO data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
