Abstract
Malignant melanoma presents a significant health burden in the UK in terms of mortality and financial cost. This aggressive and often fatal disease is under-diagnosed among patients with darker skin tones (type 5 and 6) such as Afro-Caribbean patients. A lack of both patient and practitioner awareness leads to a later diagnosis in patients with black compared to white skin. There is currently a paucity of literature looking at the diagnosis rates of melanoma between patients of different ethnicities in the UK and the reasons behind these differences. The primary aim was to obtain data on the diagnosis rate of melanoma in the primary care setting, with particular attention to white vs. black skin types. An online questionnaire was sent to 2975 general practitioner (GP) practices in England and 287 responses were received. The questionnaire contained 20 high-quality picture questions of differing common skin conditions. The participants were asked to choose their diagnosis from 20 potential diagnoses. Only 4/20 questions were melanomas, two on white and two on black skin. No accompanying histories were provided. The mean score for the questionnaire was 11.6/20 (58%) with a range from 5% to 100%. Of the two black skin melanoma pictures, 177/287 (62%) and 90/287 (31%) responses were incorrectly identified, compared to 37/287 (13%) and 19/287 (7%) in the white skin melanoma pictures. The questionnaire results show a clear increased misdiagnosis of melanoma in black patients in primary care vs. white. The results suggest that vigilance is needed when diagnosing possible melanoma in black patients and better quality melanoma teaching is required in GP training concentrating on pigmented skin. This pilot study should encourage more research into ethnic skin inequalities in the UK.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.