Abstract

AbstractThe Eschweiler–Clarke (the amine methylation) reaction was investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. First, a reaction model of H3CNH2 + HC(O)OH + CH2O + (H2O)3 → (H3C)2NH + CO2 + (H2O)4 was employed for geometry optimizations. Geometries and activation free energies of transition states (TSs) by eight DFTs, B2PLYP‐D3, B3LYP, B3LYP‐D, BP86‐D, PBE0‐D, M06‐2X, wB97X‐D, and APF‐D, along with MP2 were compared. Four elementary processes were obtained. The rate‐determining step is of the hydride‐transfer TS, H3CN+HCH2 + HCO2− → H3CNHCH3 + CO2. Whereas BP86‐D and APF‐D gave underestimated energies, M06‐2X was found to be a reasonable DFT to trace the present reaction. Second, by the use of M06‐2X/6‐311++G**, hydride‐shift TSs were examined for various sizes of the water cluster (H2O)n, and the controversial two mechanisms were evaluated. It was suggested that the first formic acid contributes to formation of the iminium ion H3CN+HCH2 and the second formic acid works for the hydride transfer. The Eschweiler–Clarke reaction was described by the scheme, R1R2NH + H2CO + (HCOOH)2 + (H2O)n → R1R2NCH3 + CO2 + HCO2− + H3O+(H2O)n.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.