Abstract
AbstractThe practice of ‘early return to work’ before full recovery is put foward in many countries as a sensible and unproblematic approach to work injuries. However, there has been a limited appraisal of its effectiveness. Questions remain about what counts as ‘effective’, how early-return-to-work policy is experienced by workers, and the internal logic of this policy. In this paper, we consider these issues as they relate to the dependence of early return to work on the concept of ‘hurt versus harm’; that is, the assumption that ‘hurt’ is pain experienced during recovery and that hurt does not necessarily impede recovery and, indeed, can improve it. Taking the case of workers’ compensation policy in Ontario, Canada, we review research and documents that justify and explain the disassociation of hurt from harm in early return to work. We argue that this concept has been applied too broadly: to situations not supported by research evidence. We contrast this with qualitative interview data from a study of...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
