Abstract

Weed management is one of the most important aspects of crop productivity; knowing the amount and the locations of weeds has been a problem that experts have faced for several decades. This paper presents three methods for weed estimation based on deep learning image processing in lettuce crops, and we compared them to visual estimations by experts. One method is based on support vector machines (SVM) using histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) as feature descriptor. The second method was based in YOLOV3 (you only look once V3), taking advantage of its robust architecture for object detection, and the third one was based on Mask R-CNN (region based convolutional neural network) in order to get an instance segmentation for each individual. These methods were complemented with a NDVI index (normalized difference vegetation index) as a background subtractor for removing non photosynthetic objects. According to chosen metrics, the machine and deep learning methods had F1-scores of 88%, 94%, and 94% respectively, regarding to crop detection. Subsequently, detected crops were turned into a binary mask and mixed with the NDVI background subtractor in order to detect weed in an indirect way. Once the weed image was obtained, the coverage percentage of weed was calculated by classical image processing methods. Finally, these performances were compared with the estimations of a set from weed experts through a Bland–Altman plot, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Dunn’s test to obtain statistical measurements between every estimation (machine-human); we found that these methods improve accuracy on weed coverage estimation and minimize subjectivity in human-estimated data.

Highlights

  • As the world population increases, so does the demand for food

  • Expert 3 is similar to RCNN and histograms of oriented gradients (HOG)-support vector machines (SVM) but has more scattered data

  • To perform the analysis based on the Blant-Alman method, the R-convolutional neural networks (CNN) method and SVM (Figure 9a) were compared

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Taking into account that land, water, and labor are limited resources, it is estimated that the efficiency of agricultural productivity will increase by 25% by the year 2050 [1]. Liakos et al [2] propose different categories to classify the challenges faced by machine learning in precision agriculture, such as livestock management, water management, soil management, detection of plant diseases, crop quality, species recognition, and weed detection. New developments in this last category would help to face the most important biological threat in crop productivity. Weeds are harder to detect due to their non-uniform presence and their overlap with other crops

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.