Abstract

Deconstruction, as a critical theory, maintains that language is a system of signs and, more precisely, a system of oppositions, differences and contradictions. Accordingly, the theory is operative in the sense that meanings are ultimately, unstable, and that a text, any text, contradicts, dismantles and even destroys itself. Hence, literary texts do not work as they appear to be working. They, in fact, ‘subvert’ and/or ‘betray’ themselves. Literary men cannot, therefore, control their works because any work, according to Derrida, the exponent of this theory, tries to defer or suppress its meaning which is ultimately shown as being unstable. Poetry is a unique act and Dickinson’s poetry reveals its gaps, inherent oppositions, and subversions. It is in the light of the theory of deconstruction that this paper tries to show that Dickinson’s poems ‘I’m wife’, ‘This is my Letter to the World’ and ‘Hope is the Thing with Feathers’ unmask their contradictions and enact the instability and indeterminacy of their meanings. Eventually, the newly established meanings of these pieces can hardly be sure of themselves and/or of being decidable.

Highlights

  • Deconstruction, as a critical theory, maintains that language is a system of signs and, more precisely, a system of oppositions, differences and contradictions

  • Poetry is a unique act and Dickinson’s poetry reveals its gaps, inherent oppositions, and subversions. It is in the light of the theory of deconstruction that this paper tries to show that Dickinson’s poems ‘I’m wife’, ‘This is my Letter to the World’ and ‘Hope is the Thing with Feathers’ unmask their contradictions and enact the instability and indeterminacy of their meanings

  • Deconstruction, as a theory, has to create new terms, a thing which explains why Derrida insists on coining new ones

Read more

Summary

PREPARATORY REMARKS

Deconstruction, as a theory, has to create new terms, a thing which explains why Derrida insists on coining new ones. Derrida (1997: 158-159) asserts that there is no outside text He means that context is essential to his concept of difference (1988: 136). Derrida argues against having eventually a nihilistic stand. In his book, Practicing Theory and Reading Literature: An Introduction, Selden briefly tries to demonstrate a Derridean method at work he realises that such a thing is “totally un-Derridean in spirit” [89]. This is how the Derridean deconstructive critical practice works: The deconstructor begins by disclosing the hierarchically ordered, metaphysical substratum of a specific piece of discourse. While structuralists had treated binary oppositions ... as stable terms in a formal structure, Derrida sees them as orgnised in unstable disequilibrium. (Selden 89)

POETRY AS A UNIQUE ACT
That could abash the little Bird
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call