Abstract
Consider a cooperative group of decision-makers striving to strategise against failing to attain a goal. The risk of failure depends on external factors and the decision-makers' assessment and acceptance of risk. This setting is complex due to multiple objectives and criteria, making it difficult for the individual and group of decision-maker(s) to assess the risk coherently. To aid humans in this situation formal risk frameworks such as utilities additives discriminants (UTADIS) have been developed. The contribution of this paper is to extend such framework with objective measures of volatility preserving its features. The solution is demonstrated and implemented on the problem of UN's policy-makers monitoring the sustainable development goal of food security. The solution provides both global risk scores and the utility threshold in an efficient manner such that misclassification between the decision-makers' preferred classification and their authentic classification is mimimised and obtained within one iteration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.