Abstract

The systematic literature review (SLR) process includes several steps to collect secondary data and analyze it to answer research questions. In this context, the document retrieval and primary study selection steps are heavily intertwined and known for their repetitiveness, high human workload, and difficulty identifying all relevant literature. This study aims to reduce human workload and error of the document retrieval and primary study selection processes using a decision support system (DSS). An open-source DSS is proposed that supports the document retrieval step, dataset preprocessing, and citation classification. The DSS is domain-independent, as it has proven to carefully select an article’s relevance based solely on the title and abstract. These features can be consistently retrieved from scientific database APIs. Additionally, the DSS is designed to run in the cloud without any required programming knowledge for reviewers. A Multi-Channel CNN architecture is implemented to support the citation screening process. With the provided DSS, reviewers can fill in their search strategy and manually label only a subset of the citations. The remaining unlabeled citations are automatically classified and sorted based on probability. It was shown that for four out of five review datasets, the DSS's use achieved significant workload savings of at least 10%. The cross-validation results show that the system provides consistent results up to 88.3% of work saved during citation screening. In two cases, our model yielded a better performance over the benchmark review datasets. As such, the proposed approach can assist the development of systematic literature reviews independent of the domain. The proposed DSS is effective and can substantially decrease the document retrieval and citation screening steps' workload and error rate.

Highlights

  • A systematic literature review (SLR) is a means of identifying, eval­ uating, and synthesizing all available research relevant to a particular research question, or topic area, or phenomenon of interest (Kitchenham & Charters, 2007). Kitchenham and Charters (2007) proposed a guide­ line where the SLR process consists of twelve steps to increase rigor and reproducibility

  • According to (Cohen et al, 2006), a significant and meaningful workload saving should be at least 10% for the Work Saved over Sampling (WSS)@95% metric

  • This stems from the fact that the citation screening process of a systematic review, when conducted manually, requires on average ~8.7 FTE to be completed, based on a 38-hour workweek

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A systematic literature review (SLR) is a means of identifying, eval­ uating, and synthesizing all available research relevant to a particular research question, or topic area, or phenomenon of interest (Kitchenham & Charters, 2007). Kitchenham and Charters (2007) proposed a guide­ line where the SLR process consists of twelve steps to increase rigor and reproducibility. A systematic literature review (SLR) is a means of identifying, eval­ uating, and synthesizing all available research relevant to a particular research question, or topic area, or phenomenon of interest (Kitchenham & Charters, 2007). Kitchenham and Charters (2007) proposed a guide­ line where the SLR process consists of twelve steps to increase rigor and reproducibility. As the literature published is proliferating, the manual production of systematic reviews requiring increased human workload. Michel­ son and Reuter (2019) calculated the financial cost of an SLR study. They provided a total time estimate to complete a systematic re­ view, which was found to take 1.72 years for a single scientific reviewer

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call