Abstract

BackgroundSince 2005, India has implemented conditional cash transfer [CCT] programs to promote the uptake of institutional delivery services [ID]. The study aims to assess changes in wealth-based inequality in the use of ID and other maternal health care services during the first decade of Janani Suraksha Yojana and related CCT programs.MethodsData from two Demographic and Health Surveys were used to calculate changes in service inequality from 2005 to 2015–16 in the use of three or more antenatal care [ANC] visits, ID, and postnatal care [PNC]. The changes were assessed at the national level, within high and low performing states [HPS and LPS, respectively] and within urban and rural areas of each state category. Erreygers Index [EI] and Wagstaff Index [WI], superior to concentration index, were used to gain different insights into the nature of inequality. EI is an objective measure of inequality irrespective of prevalence while WI is a combined measure of inequality and the average distribution of an indicator that puts more weight on the poor.ResultsThe results suggest that wealth-based inequalities decreased significantly at the national level. For ID, both indices showed a decline in both HPS and LPS though the change in WI in HPS was insignificant. For ANC, there was a significant decrease in inequality using both indices in HPS but not in LPS. For PNC, there was a significant decrease in inequality using both indices in HPS, and when using WI in LPS, but not when using EI in LPS.ConclusionOverall, the first decade of India’s CCT programs saw an impressive reduction in EI for ID but less so for WI suggesting that the benefit of CCTs did not go disproportionately to the poor, which suggests that there is a need to reduce or eliminate the evident leakages. The improvement in uptake and inequality in ANC and PNC was not at par with ID, stressing the need to place greater focus on the continuum of care. The urban rural difference in HPS versus LPS in the changes in inequality reveals that infrastructure is important for CCTs to be more effective.

Highlights

  • Since 2005, India has implemented conditional cash transfer [Conditional Cash Transfer Programs (CCT)] programs to promote the uptake of institutional delivery services [ID]

  • Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) is designed to provide differential assistance in two types of states that were categorized based on prevailing institutional delivery rates: 1) low performing states (LPS) where the cash transfer is higher and eligible women include all pregnant women delivering in public facilities and women delivering in private facilities who have the government-issued below-poverty-line (BPL) card or those belonging to a scheduled caste or tribe (SC/Scheduled Tribe (ST)) and 2) high performing states (HPS) where the cash transfer is lower and only eligible to Below Poverty Line (BPL)/Scheduled Caste (SC)/ ST women [3]

  • In urban areas of Low Performing States (LPS), the change was of 30.7 percentage points in the Participation in CCT programs among women utilizing maternal health care In addition to assessing inequality in service utilization, we investigated the extent to which women in 2015– 16, who used maternal health care services, reported that they participated in the CCT programs in order to gain insights on the differences in program participation between women in High Performing States (HPS) and LPS and how well the programs were targeted to the poor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 2005, India has implemented conditional cash transfer [CCT] programs to promote the uptake of institutional delivery services [ID]. The year 2005 was a turning point for maternal and reproductive health in India because it marked the start of a trend of using conditional cash transfer programs (CCT) as a strategy to promote institutional delivery. Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), which is to date the largest CCT program in the world, was launched that year in order to promote the use of institutional delivery services, and in turn, reduce maternal and neonatal mortality rates. JSY is designed to provide differential assistance in two types of states that were categorized based on prevailing institutional delivery rates: 1) low performing states (LPS) where the cash transfer is higher and eligible women include all pregnant women delivering in public facilities and women delivering in private facilities who have the government-issued below-poverty-line (BPL) card or those belonging to a scheduled caste or tribe (SC/ST) and 2) high performing states (HPS) where the cash transfer is lower and only eligible to BPL/SC/ ST women [3]. The ASHA package has been divided into two equal portions – one for the antenatal care component and the other for the institutional delivery component [3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call