Abstract

This study examined the effects of a daytime nap on the retention of implicitly learnt “first-order conditional” (FOC) and “second-order conditional” (SOC) motor sequences. The implicit learning and retention of a motor sequence has been linked to the neural processes undertaken by the basal ganglia and primary motor cortex (i.e., procedural memory system). There is evidence, however, suggesting that SOC learning may further rely on the hippocampus-supported declarative memory system. Sleep appears to benefit the retention of information processed by the declarative memory system, but not the procedural memory system. Thus, it was hypothesized that sleep would benefit the retention of a SOC motor sequence but not a FOC sequence. The implicit learning and retention of these sequences was examined using the Serial Reaction Time Task. In this study, healthy adults implicitly learnt either a FOC (n = 20) or a SOC sequence (n = 20). Retention of both sequences was assessed following a daytime nap and period of wakefulness. Sleep was not found to improve the retention of the SOC sequence. There were no significant differences in the retention of a FOC or a SOC sequence following a nap or period of wakefulness. The study questions whether the declarative memory system is involved in the retention of implicitly learnt SOC sequences.

Highlights

  • The ability to implicitly or incidentally learn and retain sequentially structured information has been proposed to support motor, social, reading, and language skills (Karni, 1996; Clegg et al, 1998; Van Overwalle, 2009; Hamrick et al, 2018; Hedenius et al, 2020)

  • This study examined the effect of sleep on the retention of implicitly learnt FOC and SOC sequences

  • The amount of time spent in N3 sleep was not related to the retention of the SOC sequence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to implicitly or incidentally learn and retain sequentially structured information has been proposed to support motor, social, reading, and language skills (Karni, 1996; Clegg et al, 1998; Van Overwalle, 2009; Hamrick et al, 2018; Hedenius et al, 2020). Unbeknownst to participants, on some blocks of trials the order that the visual stimulus appears follows a pre-determined sequence. Measures Participants were presented with a series of tasks and surveys to measure handedness and general cognitive functioning. Data from these tasks were obtained to evaluate whether participants in the FOC and SOC groups differed on variables that might explain potential group differences in sequence retention. Handedness was measured using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971) This inventory comprises 12 items in which participants indicate which hand/foot/eye is used to complete common tasks. To obtain an estimate of general cognitive functioning, participants were administered the Matrix Reasoning subtest from the Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (Weschler, 1999).

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call