Abstract

We demonstrate the use of a probabilistic generative model to explore the biomarker changes occurring as Alzheimer's disease develops and progresses. We enhanced the recently introduced event-based model for use with a multi-modal sporadic disease data set. This allows us to determine the sequence in which Alzheimer's disease biomarkers become abnormal without reliance on a priori clinical diagnostic information or explicit biomarker cut points. The model also characterizes the uncertainty in the ordering and provides a natural patient staging system. Two hundred and eighty-five subjects (92 cognitively normal, 129 mild cognitive impairment, 64 Alzheimer's disease) were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with measurements of 14 Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers including cerebrospinal fluid proteins, regional magnetic resonance imaging brain volume and rates of atrophy measures, and cognitive test scores. We used the event-based model to determine the sequence of biomarker abnormality and its uncertainty in various population subgroups. We used patient stages assigned by the event-based model to discriminate cognitively normal subjects from those with Alzheimer's disease, and predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment. The model predicts that cerebrospinal fluid levels become abnormal first, followed by rates of atrophy, then cognitive test scores, and finally regional brain volumes. In amyloid-positive (cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β1-42 < 192 pg/ml) or APOE-positive (one or more APOE4 alleles) subjects, the model predicts with high confidence that the cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers become abnormal in a distinct sequence: amyloid-β1-42, phosphorylated tau, total tau. However, in the broader population total tau and phosphorylated tau are found to be earlier cerebrospinal fluid markers than amyloid-β1-42, albeit with more uncertainty. The model's staging system strongly separates cognitively normal and Alzheimer's disease subjects (maximum classification accuracy of 99%), and predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (maximum balanced accuracy of 77% over 3 years), and from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (maximum balanced accuracy of 76% over 5 years). By fitting Cox proportional hazards models, we find that baseline model stage is a significant risk factor for conversion from both mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (P = 2.06 × 10(-7)) and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment (P = 0.033). The data-driven model we describe supports hypothetical models of biomarker ordering in amyloid-positive and APOE-positive subjects, but suggests that biomarker ordering in the wider population may diverge from this sequence. The model provides useful disease staging information across the full spectrum of disease progression, from cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. This approach has broad application across neurodegenerative disease, providing insights into disease biology, as well as staging and prognostication.

Highlights

  • Existing biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease provide complimentary information for disease staging and differential diagnosis

  • The most well validated of these are CSF amyloidb1–42 (Blennow and Hampel, 2003) and amyloid PET imaging (Klunk et al, 2004; Clark et al, 2011), which measure brain amyloid pathology; CSF phosphorylated tau and total tau (Blennow and Hampel, 2003), as measures of neurofibrillary tangle deposition and neuroaxonal damage; fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET (Herholz, 2012), a measure of brain metabolism; volume and atrophy rate markers derived from structural MRI (Fox and Schott, 2004), which are used to measure the extent and rate of regional neurodegeneration; and cognitive test scores such as the MiniMental State Examination (McKhann et al, 1984), which measure cognitive performance

  • We demonstrate the fine-grained staging potential of the event-based model (EBM) and its ability both to classify cognitively normal and Alzheimer’s disease subjects and to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal to mild cognitive impairment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Existing biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease provide complimentary information for disease staging and differential diagnosis. Determining the particular sequence and evolution of biomarker abnormality potentially provides a mechanism to stage and stratify patients throughout the full disease time course, and in particular, during the presymptomatic phase. This helps reduce heterogeneity in trial groups, match individuals to putative treatments, and monitor treatment outcomes. Alzheimer’s disease is characterized pathologically by the buildup of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in brain tissue (Braak and Braak, 1991). These pathologies are thought to precede downstream neurodegeneration (i.e. neuronal loss), which leads to clinical symptoms. The most well validated of these are CSF amyloidb (Blennow and Hampel, 2003) and amyloid PET imaging (Klunk et al, 2004; Clark et al, 2011), which measure brain amyloid pathology; CSF phosphorylated tau and total tau (Blennow and Hampel, 2003), as measures of neurofibrillary tangle deposition and neuroaxonal damage; fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET (Herholz, 2012), a measure of brain metabolism; volume and atrophy rate markers derived from structural MRI (Fox and Schott, 2004), which are used to measure the extent and rate of regional neurodegeneration; and cognitive test scores such as the MiniMental State Examination (McKhann et al, 1984), which measure cognitive performance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call