Abstract
Screening tests are used frequently for control of diseases such as cancer. The increased survival time of screen-detected cases over those that are detected clinically may be due in part to 'lead time', or the length of time by which the disease is diagnosed earlier by screening in the presence or absence of any real extension in survival time. A realistic evaluation of screening needs to assess the true benefit of screening; that is, the length of time by which survival has been extended, beyond merely the time of the advanced diagnosis. The comparison of survival measured from time of entry between cases in a screening arm and in a control arm in randomized studies avoids the lead time bias. If the effects of average lead time and average benefit on survival are additive, these effects can be estimated by recognizing that (a) the difference in survival curves since time of diagnosis confounds benefit and lead time, but (b) the difference in survival curves since time of start of study involves benefit only. The method is evaluated on simulated data for its accuracy and may be used on data from randomized studies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
