Abstract

Ecology has reached the point where data science competitions, in which multiple groups solve the same problem using the same data by different methods, will be productive for advancing quantitative methods for tasks such as species identification from remote sensing images. We ran a competition to help improve three tasks that are central to converting images into information on individual trees: (1) crown segmentation, for identifying the location and size of individual trees; (2) alignment, to match ground truthed trees with remote sensing; and (3) species classification of individual trees. Six teams (composed of 16 individual participants) submitted predictions for one or more tasks. The crown segmentation task proved to be the most challenging, with the highest-performing algorithm yielding only 34% overlap between remotely sensed crowns and the ground truthed trees. However, most algorithms performed better on large trees. For the alignment task, an algorithm based on minimizing the difference, in terms of both position and tree size, between ground truthed and remotely sensed crowns yielded a perfect alignment. In hindsight, this task was over simplified by only including targeted trees instead of all possible remotely sensed crowns. Several algorithms performed well for species classification, with the highest-performing algorithm correctly classifying 92% of individuals and performing well on both common and rare species. Comparisons of results across algorithms provided a number of insights for improving the overall accuracy in extracting ecological information from remote sensing. Our experience suggests that this kind of competition can benefit methods development in ecology and biology more broadly.

Highlights

  • In many areas of science and technology there are tasks for which solutions can be optimized using well-defined measures of success

  • We provided Individual tree crown (ITC) data for crowns sampled in the field only and asked participants to link each single ITC to a specific field label

  • We developed and ran a data science competition on converting airborne remote sensing data into information on individual trees, with the goal of improving methods for using remote sensing to produce ecological information and accelerating methods development in ecology more broadly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In many areas of science and technology there are tasks for which solutions can be optimized using well-defined measures of success. When a clear measure of success can be defined, one approach to rapidly improving the methods used by the field is through open competitions (Carpenter, 2011). In these competitions, many different groups attempt to solve the same problem with the same data. Many different groups attempt to solve the same problem with the same data This standardization of data and evaluation allows many different approaches to be assessed quickly and compared. Because the problems are well defined and data is cleaned and organized centrally, competitions can allow involvement by diverse participants, from those with domain expertise, to those in fields like modeling and machine learning

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call