Abstract
Pyrolysis of the organometallic polymer: {{[N=P(R1)]0.8[N=P(OC6H4CH2CN[Ru])2]0.15[N=P((OC6H5)(OC6H4CH2CN[Ru]]0.05}{Cl}0.31} n , [Ru]=CpRu(PPh3)2, R1 = O2C12H8 (1) as well of the cyclic specie {N3P3 (OC6H5)5(OC6H4CH2CN[Ru])}{PF6} (2) under a flow of air at 800°C affords nanostructured RuO2. Nanoparticles near to 10 nm were observed. The differences in the use of cyclic or polymeric phosphazenes, as solid state template, influence strongly the morphology and slightly the composition of the pyrolytic product. Temperature variable (SQUID) measurements in the range of 5–300 K of the material obtained from the polymer, indicate an antiferromagnetic interaction between the Ru atoms, although lower than that found for the crystalline ruthenium oxide, probably due to some amorphous product present in the pyrolytic material. The possible formation mechanism is discussed and the differences in using the cyclic or the polymeric compound as precursor is analyzed in terms of the relative content of Ru to P, N. A general formation method of nanostructured metal oxides is proposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
