Abstract

In this study, we explored 2 questions: (a) Consistent with the cultural match theory (CMT), did treatment adherence and outcome improve as discrepancies between the cultural features of an anxiety treatment and patient characteristics decreased, and (b) In agreement with the specific therapy ingredient model (STIM), did the psychotherapeutic outcomes of a Culturally Competent Relaxation Intervention (CCRI) designed to reduce anxiety more effectively reduce anxiety rather than depression symptoms? The CCRI includes allocentric (the tendency to define oneself in relationship to others) relaxation interventions, while traditional relaxation strategies employ idiocentric (the tendency to define oneself in isolation from others) relaxation interventions. The CCRI was assessed with 44 Latino/a adults of low socioeconomic backgrounds. The results supported 2 hypotheses: (a) Based on the CMT, a relationship was found between participants' levels of allocentrism and their consequent levels of treatment adherence, and (b) Consistent with the STIM, treatment adherence on the CCRI was correlated with reductions in anxiety, but not with depressive symptoms. These findings are discussed with a focus on future efforts to create culturally competent interventions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.