Abstract

BackgroundThe biological risk factors of inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are well established. However, risk groups are hard to reach and they may have misperceptions of their need for change. This study explored self-ratings of physical fitness (PF) and the relationship between objectively estimated physical fitness (PFI) and psychosocial factors among Finnish men of working-age.MethodsCross-sectional data on 899 Finnish men (aged 18–64) were collected in 2011. Health- related physical fitness was evaluated with a physical fitness index calculated from the results of selected fitness tests. The men were subsequently classified into three groups: low, moderate and high PFI. Psychosocial factors and self-rated fitness were elicited in the questionnaire. The data were analysed with crosstabulations, chi square-test and logistic regression analysis.ResultsOne-fifth of the participants had low PFI. Forty-five per cent of the low-fit middle-aged (35–49 years) men self-reported poor PF, while 80 per cent of the younger (18–34 years) low-fit men self-reported moderate or good PF. The health benefits and recommended dose of physical activity were well known in all the PFI categories. The low-fit men were health conscious, but lacked adequate exercise skills, self-efficacy and social support. However, logistic regressions revealed that, in the younger men, likelihood of better knowledge was not related to higher PFI. Among the 50-to-64-year-old men, high PFI was not associated with a higher social support.ConclusionsPoor exercise skills, self-efficacy and social support were related to low PFI. Physical activity promotion for low-fit men should take into account age differences in the relationship between psychosocial factors and physical fitness. Thus, new and effective ways to establish social support and motivation for physical activity among low-fit men in all working-age groups are needed. Further research is also warranted on whether estimation of PFI could be used as a practical health counselling tool.

Highlights

  • The biological risk factors of inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are well established

  • Knowledge was not related to high physical fitness (PFI) in the youngest group and social support was not related to better PFI in the men aged 50–64

  • The present results suggest that social support appears to have more impact on Physical activity (PA) in younger than older men

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The biological risk factors of inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness are well established. One-half of working-aged (18–64 years) men in Europe are sufficiently active [5] and up to 70 are overweight or obese [6]. Both poor cardiorespiratory fitness and abdominal obesity are associated with elevated risk for metabolic diseases and mortality among men [7]. Men are aware of the health benefits of adequate PA, but knowledge is a poor motivator for changes in health behaviour. Physical fitness testing and individualized feedback have been used in health counselling in order to increase awareness of current PF and motivation for health behaviour changes [17,18,19]. The reasons for low PF and inactivity do not reside in knowledge alone

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call