A Cross-Sectional Study of Disparities in Screening Guideline Concordance Within a Student-Run Clinic.

Abstract

Examination of screening guideline concordance can help clinics and institutions identify and understand disparities within their own practices. We conducted a study to examine whether screening completion rates within a student-run free clinic (SRFC) reflected, exacerbated, or narrowed population-level disparities in outcomes by race/ethnicity and primary language. We compared completion rates for cervical cancer (n = 114), diabetic retinopathy (n = 91), colorectal cancer (n = 114), and breast cancer (n = 63) by race/ethnicity (Black, n = 37; Hispanic, n = 133; white, n = 54; other, n = 29) and primary language (English, n = 106; Spanish, n = 136; other, n = 11) among patients at Shade tree clinic (STC), an SFRC in Nashville, TN. There were no differences in screening completion rate by race/ethnicity, and Spanish-speaking patients had slightly higher rates of cervical cancer screening [91% (95% confidence interval 84–97%)] than English-speaking patients [72% (57–86%)]. Overall screening rates were comparable to national averages, and in the case of screenings performed within clinic—cervical cancer [82%; (75–89%)] and diabetic retinopathy screening [86% (79–92%)]—exceeded national averages and/or affiliated academic medical center goals. These findings extend the existing literature supporting the ability of SRFCs to provide effective care by also demonstrating one measure of equity in clinic processes, providing a framework for future studies of equity within SRFCs and traditional primary care practices.