Abstract
Critical Legal Studies (CLS) provides a theoretical critique of the law in operation. To date, very few CLS analyses have focused upon criminal law. This phenomenon is particularly glaring given the prominence of criminal law in the American judicial system. This paper provides an overview of the CLS movement and a discussion of the value of deconstructing criminal law cases. Four legal formalisms are then used to critique the McCleskey v. Kemp1 decision. A fifth formalism, the sociology of race relations, is offered and applied to critique McCleskey.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.