Abstract
Social workers are a dominant presence in public mental health, and many serve as intensive case managers. This critical review of randomized field trials of intensive case management for individuals with serious and persistent mental illness finds only qualified support for the efficacy of intensive case management. This article reviews published trials since the inception of the CSS initiative. Inadequate sample sizes by design and attrition, vaguely delimited conceptual frameworks, and inconclusive analysis strategies are faulted for the inconclusiveness of the research to date. Directions for correcting these weaknesses in case management research and in random trials of social work practice research in general are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
