Abstract

In designing adequate ductility into a frame structure to resist earthquake forces, the portion of the procedure which has the least satisfactory theoretical and experimental basis is the strictly design part. This is the section in which the designer, having assessed the ductility demands of the various members of the frame, proceeds to decide on the concrete dimensions and reinforcement pattern which will satisfy these demands. The reasons for the shortcomings are fairly obvious. Unlike frame analysis and frame response, which can be dealt with as tidy applied mechanics problems, investigation of the design problems requires research workers with an extensive design background, and an awareness of all the design criteria which have to be satisfied. Unfortunately, such research workers are rare, and consequently insufficient research has been carried out. What research has been done has obviously not been planned with a view to obtaining information that can be used in design.

Highlights

  • In designing adequate ductility into a frame structure to resist earthquake forces, the portion of the procedure which has the least satisfactory theoretical and experimental basis is the strictly design part

  • The main provisions of the SEAOC requirements can be summarised as attempting to accomplish the following in frame design: (1) To provide adequate plastic hinge rotation capacity in all members, adjacent to member junctions, by the addition of special transverse confining reinforcement at these locations

  • Once a designer starts to use the SEAOC procedures, he soon becomes aware of two major defects

Read more

Summary

Area in which More Information is Required

In designing adequate ductility into a frame structure to resist earthquake forces, the portion of the procedure which has the least satisfactory theoretical and experimental basis is the strictly design part. This is the section in which the designer, having assessed the ductility demands of the various members of the frame, proceeds to decide on the concrete dimensions and reinforcement pattern which will satisfy these demands. Unlike frame analysis and frame response, which can be dealt with as tidy applied mechanics problems, investigation of the design problems requires research workers with an extensive design background, and an awareness of all the design criteria which have to be satisfied. What research has been done has obviously not been planned with a view to obtaining information that can be used in design

Present Design Procedures
Summary of SEAOC Requirements
General Shortcomings of SEAOC Procedures
Severity of Hinge Rotations at Bottoms of Columns
Doubt about SEAOC Procedures for Confining Steel for Large Columns
Summary of Positions Regarding Present SEAOC Hoop
10. Necessity for Additional Research
12. Suggested Modifications to SEAOC Formula for Amount of Confining Steel

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.