A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Uptake of Critical Perspectives in Occupational Science

Abstract

An emancipatory agenda is emerging within occupational science, building on the work of scholars who have advocated for a more critical, reflexive and socially responsive discipline. Although several analyses of the discipline's genesis and underpinning paradigms have been presented and there has been an increasing use of critical approaches in recent publications, little is known about how critical perspectives have been taken up in the occupational science literature. This study presents a critical interpretive synthesis, a methodology that enables synthesis of large amounts of diverse qualitative data and facilitates critical engagement with the assumptions that shape and inform a body of research. The study included articles published between 1996 and 2013 in the Journal of Occupational Science that implicitly or explicitly took up critical perspectives. It was conducted in relation to questions regarding: (a) how “critical” has been defined in this literature and (b) how critical perspectives are being utilized to inform occupational science. In addition to describing three “turns” in how critical perspectives have and are being employed, this article discusses the implications of these results in relation to the aim of developing as a socially responsive discipline.