Abstract
The relation between biofouling and membrane flux in spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in drinking water stations with extensive pretreatment such as ultrafiltration has been studied. The flux – water volume flowing through the membrane per unit area and time – is not influencing the development of membrane biofouling. Irrespective whether a flux was applied or not, the feed spacer channel pressure drop and biofilm concentration increased in reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in a monitor, test rigs, a pilot scale and a full-scale installation. Identical behavior with respect to biofouling and feed channel pressure drop development was observed in membrane elements in the same position in a nanofiltration installation operated with and without flux. Calculation of the ratio of diffusive and convective flux showed that the diffusive flux is considerably larger than the convective flux, supporting the observations that the convective flux due to permeate production is playing an insignificant role in biofouling. Since fouling occurred irrespective of the actual flux, the critical flux concept stating that “below a critical flux no fouling occurs” is not a suitable approach to control biofouling of spiral wound reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
