Abstract
The report of the Committee of Review into Australian Industrial Relations Law and Systems is most disappointing. It is poorly structured, lacks a theoretical base, is confused and contradictory, and contains unfounded assertions. The Committee endorsed the status quo, producing an anti-climactic report, and made no serious attempt to consider alternative proposals for the future development of Australian industrial relations. This paper highlights various problems associated with three key recommendations of the report: the cross-commissioning of state and federal personnel; the creation of a new Court and Commission and the use of dual appointments; and the abolition of unions with less than a thousand members.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
