Abstract
Abstract The statements of purpose, justification, procedure, and conclusion in Fusaro's research report were evaluated as to their realism, logic, and justifiable inferences. The structure and contributions of the three studies on which it was based were also examined. Available evidence indicates that Fusaro's study was not based on a realistic expectation that certain knowledge ought to be presented among the subjects, the procedure was not logically consistent, and aspects of universality were unjustifiably inferred in the statements of purpose, instructions to the subjects, and conclusion statements. Consequently, it cannot be regarded as a useful contribution to the science of reading instruction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
