Abstract
A comprehensive protocol was developed for assessing urodynamics instrumentation and applied to eight commercial urodynamics systems obtained on short-term loan. Assessment covered the areas of design and construction, measurement accuracy, and software performance. The measurement performance of virtually all systems was found to be adequate for the application. The main areas of weakness were susceptibility to artefact, poor user-friendliness, and lack of physical ruggedness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
