Abstract
Least-squares Monte Carlo generates regression-based continuation value estimators that are heteroscedastic. Fabozzi et al. (2017) propose weighted least-squares regression to correct for this. We show that heteroscedastic-corrected estimators are more accurate than uncorrected estimators far from the exercise boundary and where the exercise decision is obvious. However, the corrected estimators do not translate into improved exercise decisions and hence correcting has little effect on option price estimates. This holds when using alternative specifications for the correction and when implementing an iterative method. We conclude that correcting for heteroscedasticity does not result in more efficient prices and generally should be avoided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
