A “credit default swap” secured transaction: the risk of its recharacterization into a suretyship agreement

E G Kolesnikova

doi:10.17803/1994-1471.2019.99.2.070-075

Abstract

The article deals with two current situations when the Russian Bank (hereinafter — the Bank) is: 1) a provider; 2) a recipient of credit protection under an OTC derivative transaction “credit default swap” (hereinafter — CDS) that has the nature of security and is subject to both Russian or English law. It is emphasized that in these situations, Russian courts and tax authorities may carry out undesirable for the Bank reclassification of CDS transaction into the contract of guarantee. The paper provides for the description of consequences that may occur if the Bank implements that risk: 1) the Bank may be held responsible for illegal reduction of the tax base on income tax in the amount of credit protection paid by it on CDS; 2) a Russian court may refuse to satisfy the Bank’s claim to recover from the controlling person the amount of the debt on the principal obligation to the Bank in the amount of credit protection already received by the Bank provided that the Bank has received the amount of credit protection on CDS. It is concluded that in order to execute transactions that ensure proper fulfillment of the obligations of the controlling person to the recipient of credit protection, it is necessary to use a surety agreement or standard CDS terms and conditions, including a clause that such transactions are not derivative financial instruments.

Highlights

Банковская система и банковская деятельность ву, преследующие исключительно цель обеспечения надлежащего исполнения обязательств контрольного лица перед получателем кредитной защиты, с точки зрения английского права являются нехарактерными для деривативных сделок и наиболее близки по своей правовой природе к договорам поручительства по английскому праву, чем к спекулятивным в своей сущности кредитным производных финансовых инструментов (ПФИ), также предусмотренным английским правом, в первую очередь для удобства оформления которых и были подготовлены ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions[4]
The article deals with two current situations when the Russian Bank is: 1) a provider; 2) a recipient of credit protection under an OTC derivative transaction “credit default swap”
The paper provides for the description of consequences that may occur if the Bank implements that risk: 1) the Bank may be held responsible for illegal reduction of the tax base on income tax in the amount of credit protection paid by it on CDS; 2) a Russian court may refuse to satisfy the Bank’s claim to recover from the controlling person the amount of the debt on the principal obligation to the Bank in the amount of credit protection already received by the Bank provided that the Bank has received the amount of credit protection on CDS

Summary

Introduction

Что для оформления сделок, обеспечивающих надлежащее исполнение обязательств контрольного лица перед получателем кредитной защиты, стоит использовать договор поручительства или Стандартные условия CDS, включив в них оговорку, что такие сделки не являются производными финансовыми инструментами.

Results

Conclusion