Abstract
The study aims to identify the types of relationships related to the conversation, teaching methods, language testing, syntax, micro-teaching, classroom management, and teaching practice. It is hypothesized that there is no linear relationship between the two variables, r= 0. In other words, no connection is there between the teaching programs at the university and performing well at schools during practising. Thus, and by contrast, there is a linear relationship between the two variables, r ≠0. In other words, the teaching programs at the university and teaching practice are related. However, there is an uncertainty that performing well at schools could be solely due to the effectiveness of taught programs and personal in-built talents. Specifically, the study tries to answer these questions: 1. Is there any relationship between the teaching programs and teaching well at schools during practising? If yes, how strong is that? 2. Which teaching program is relatively strongly related to the teaching practice module? And 3. Does personal in-built talent bring about an escalation in performing well at schools during practicing? Also, the study aims to figure out any connection between programs at university and teaching performance at schools by identifying the type and the magnitude of the relationship available. Also, it attempts to highlight the most influential positive or negative connection between the taught program variables. Further, it reveals the rationale beyond teaching practice achievements and, consequently, relates them to the actual causes. The study revealed that there is a positive relationship between all the selected modules and teaching practice based on the Pearson Correlation test calculating the coefficient value output at 0.494 with a p. value of 0.000. Since correlation does not mean causation, the findings report a kind of confusion about whether teaching programs are beyond teaching well at schools.
Highlights
The study aims to identify the types of relationships related to the conversation, teaching methods, language testing, syntax, micro-teaching, classroom management, and teaching practice
The study revealed that there is a positive relationship between all the selected modules and teaching practice based on the Pearson Correlation test calculating the coefficient value output at 0.494 with a p. value of 0.000
Since correlation does not mean causation, the findings report a kind of confusion about whether teaching programs are beyond teaching well at schools
Summary
There have always been issues regarding an allegedly kind of doubt concerning the practitioners’ teaching ability in association with the taught programs at university At this point, such claim has given rise to emerging the sense of correlative investigation into the case as to find out the efficacy flow of bringing about results on the actual ground. The current study, which adopts a correlation research design, aims to figure out any connection between programs at university and teaching performance at schools by identifying the type and the magnitude of the relationship available. It attempts to highlight the most influential positive or negative connection between the taught program variables. It reveals the rationale beyond teaching practice achievements and, relates them to the actual causes
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
