Abstract
In the paper A non-implication between fragments of Martin’s Axiom related to a property which comes from Aronszajn trees (Yorioka, 2010 [1]), Proposition 2.7 is not true. To avoid this error and correct Proposition 2.7, the definition of the property R 1 , ℵ 1 is changed. In Yorioka (2010) [1], all proofs of lemmas and theorems but Lemma 6.9 are valid about this definition without changing the proofs. We give a new statement and a new proof of Lemma 6.9.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
