Abstract

The Multilayer Model (MLM) has been used for many years to infer dry deposition fluxes from measured trace species concentrations and standard meteorological measurements for national networks in the U.S., including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet). MLM utilizes a resistance analogy to calculate deposition velocities appropriate for whole vegetative canopies, while employing a multilayer integration to account for vertically varying meteorology, canopy morphology and radiative transfer within the canopy. However, the MLM formulation, as it was originally presented and as it has been subsequently employed, contains a non-physical representation related to the leaf-level quasi-laminar boundary layer resistance that affects the calculation of the total canopy resistance. In this note, the non-physical representation of the canopy resistance as originally formulated in MLM is discussed and a revised, physically consistent, formulation is suggested as a replacement. The revised canopy resistance formulation reduces estimates of HNO3 deposition velocities by as much as 38% during mid-day as compared to values generated by the original formulation. Inferred deposition velocities for SO2 and O3 are not significantly altered by the change in formulation (<3%). Inferred deposition loadings of oxidized and total nitrogen from CASTNet data may be reduced by 10–20% and 5–10%, respectively, for the Eastern U. S. when employing the revised formulation of MLM as compared to the original formulation.

Highlights

  • 2000) has been used for many years to infer dry depo- and Schwede (2000) is currently employed to infer dry deposition sition fluxes from measured trace species concentrations and fluxes from measurements made in the CASTNET network selected meteorological measurements for U.S national networks (Schwede et al, 2001; Baumgardner et al, 2002; Sickles and (Clarke et al, 1997; Finkelstein et al, 2000; Schwede et al, 2011; Shadwick, 2007; Bowker et al, 2011; USEPA, 2013)

  • We explore the impact of this non-physical formulation and suggest a revised formulation that is more consistent with the accepted conceptual model of multilayer resistance-based dry deposition

  • It is clear that the boundary layer resistance is in series independent of the two subsequent parallel pathways for trace species deposition, so that the canopy resistance should be formulated as rcðzÞ 1⁄4 rbðzÞ þ rlðzÞ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Close inspection of the MLM formulation, as it is presented by Meyers et al (1998) and as it is typically employed (Finkelstein et al, 2000; Finkelstein, 2001; Baumgardner et al, 2002; Sickles and Shadwick, 2007; Schwede et al, 2011), reveals a representation of the leaf-level quasilaminar boundary layer resistance, rb, that is non-physical In this technical note, we explore the impact of this non-physical formulation and suggest a revised formulation that is more consistent with the accepted conceptual model of multilayer resistance-based dry deposition

Multilayer model description and revised formulation
Analysis of the original and revised formulations
Findings
Impact of the revised formulation on MLM whole canopy deposition velocities
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call