Abstract

The aim of the paper is to study how the problem of mass migration is presented in the British press. Frequency of occurrences of the words “migrants” and “migration” are analysed in four British press titles: two newspapers represent a conservative bias and two a centre-left political alignment; at the same time, two newspapers exemplify quality press and two are tabloids. The methodology used in this study follows a corpus-assisted approach to language analysis, which is conducted in a bottom-up fashion, also known as a corpus-driven study (Tognini-Bonelli 2001). The analysis shows that the representation of the problem of migration in the four British newspapers is generally negative, and the negativity revolves mainly around illegal entry, employment and abuse of the social benefit system, which results in frequent social and political exclusion of migrants on economic and legal bases. Secondly, the conservative press focus on criticising migration and migrants while the labour-oriented press, in particular The Guardian, express compassion and sympathy towards migrants. Moreover, quality papers devote much more space to discussing the problem of migration than tabloids.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.