Abstract
Label English is common in spoken English, but for most English learners, it is difficult to use and express labels correctly and appropriately. This is mainly due to their lack of understanding of this expression. Label English is equivalent to Chinese grammar, using different markup components to form a complete sentence. In this paper, five tags commonly used by native English speakers, namely, or something, or something, and so on, and that, and everything, will be studied. Through the method of fuzzy evaluation, it illustrates the use of labels by Chinese English learners and the similarities and differences between Chinese English learners and native English speakers. Corpus is a product of language research and corresponding computer technology. It is a model of the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in language research. It makes its due contribution to revealing the essence of language and can provide scientific basis for language research. Based on the above background, the purpose of this paper is to study tags in spoken English through corpus and vague evaluation. And the top five tags are retrieved in CLEC and LOB. Then, the frequency of occurrence is counted. Finally, the variance of each label is calculated by using the method of fuzzy evaluation, to determine whether there are significant differences between the two corpuses. The fuzzy evaluation method can make the results clear and systematic, can better solve the vague and difficult to quantify problems, and is suitable for solving various non-deterministic problems. The results show that besides “and so on,” Chinese English learners use labels less frequently than native English speakers. In terms of structure, both of them adopt the prototype of tags, but most Chinese learners misuse some of their own tags. The main reasons for this phenomenon are mother tongue transfer and inadequate pragmatic competence. In contrast, native English speakers use tags more frequently. In terms of usage form, the prototypes of the above five tags are used, but there are also variants, mainly in the form of expansion and lexical variants. The 106 tagged words found in CLEC were searched one by one in COLSEC. It was found that only 19 expressions appeared in the corpus, with a total frequency of only 271 and a standard frequency of 371. The total frequency of this type of expression in LOB is 11072 times, and the standard frequency is 1055 times. In addition, these expressions also have the pragmatic functions of inference, reinforcement, and compliance.
Highlights
The purpose of this paper is to study the label language in spoken English through corpus and fuzzy evaluation and to search for the top five fuzzy label words in CLEC and LOB
Evaluation Procedure Based on the Fuzzy Evaluation Method
The use of the fuzzy evaluation method for the study of label language in spoken English includes four main steps: one is to determine the set of factors, and the abovementioned indicators through the test are used as factors to build the set in order; the second is to give a set of comments, according to each indicator according to its own
Summary
One of the most important characteristics of human language is its productivity, which means that language users can manipulate a limited set of linguistic rules to create unlimited new expressions and sentences [1, 2]. In a sense, this is a fact, but it is not the case. Just as two people see the same thing is beautiful, the degree of beauty of the objects they evaluate is obviously different This is because of the characteristics of the language itself. The rational thinking of Westerners thinks of using mathematical methods to define some fuzzy evaluations, which is the reason for fuzzy mathematics
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.