Abstract

Part I of this paper provides a brief history of the U.S. occupation and annexation of Hawaii. Part II explores Native Hawaiian land rights in the contexts of both domestic and international law. Part III concludes that the Akaka bill fails to recognize the legal landscape of Native Hawaiian land and natural resource rights. By denying the de jure posture of the relevant parties in favor of their de facto relations, the Akaka bill unlawfully constricts Native Hawaiians’ rights of self-determination and sets a troubling precedent for future relations between the Kanaka Maoli and the U.S. Moreover, the bill indulges in a colonial narrative of the disposition of land and natural resource rights that threatens all indigenous groups in the United States.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call