Abstract

Consider a sequence of Poisson point processes of non-trivial loops with certain intensity measures $(\mu^{(n)})_n$, where each $\mu^{(n)}$ is explicitly determined by transition probabilities $p^{(n)}$ of a random walk on a finite state space $V^{(n)}$ together with an additional killing parameter $c^{(n)}=e^{-a\cdot\sharp V^{(n)}+o(\sharp V^{(n)})}$. We are interested in asymptotic behavior of typical loops. Under general assumptions, we study the asymptotics of the length of a loop sampled from the normalized intensity measure $\bar{\mu}^{(n)}$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$. A typical loop is small for $a=0$ and extremely large for $a=\infty$. For $a=(0,\infty)$, we observe both small and extremely large loops. We obtain explicit formulas for the asymptotics of the mass of intensity measures, the asymptotics of the proportion of big loops, limit results on the number of vertices (with multiplicity) visited by a loop sampled from $\bar{\mu}^{(n)}$. We verify our general assumptions for random walk loop soups on discrete tori and truncated regular trees. Finally, we consider random walk loop soups on complete graphs. Here, our general assumptions are violated. In this case, we observe different asymptotic behavior of the length of a typical loop.

Highlights

  • Poisson ensembles of Markovian loops were introduced informally by Symanzik [16] and by Lawler and Werner [11] for 2D Brownian motion

  • We are interested in asymptotic behavior of typical loops

  • We study the asymptotics of the length of a loop sampled from the normalized intensity measure μ(n) as n → ∞

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Poisson ensembles of Markovian loops were introduced informally by Symanzik [16] and by Lawler and Werner [11] for 2D Brownian motion. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on an upper bound on the transition functions of Markov processes and a direct calculation. In the same setting as Theorem 1.2, let Ln be a Poisson point process of loops with intensity μ(n)/ log n. ∈Ln 1 ∈C converges in distribution to a Poisson random variable with mean a, where C stands for the set of loops which cover all the vertices inside the graph. We consider random walk loop soups on complete graphs and prove Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 1.3 in the last section. Note that det((1 + c(n)) · I − p(n)) is the partition function of weighted spanning trees rooted at the cemetery point ∂ of a Markov chain with transition probabilities (1 + c(n))−1p(n), see [12, Section 8.2].

Example: discrete tori
Example: balls in a regular tree

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.