A convenient, non-hydrating electrolyte medium for the measurement of electrodermal activity.

Abstract

ABSTRACTTwo experiments with 12 subjects each compared electrodermal recordings taken simultaneously with four different electrolyte media. These were polyethylene glycol, Unibase/glycol, Unibase, and hydrated agar (i.e., a site recorded with agar electrolyte after presoaking it with water). The primary purpose was to compare the electrolyte containing a mixture of Unibase/glycol with the other electrolytes. The glycol and the hydrated agar were assumed to reflect low and high levels of epidermal hydration, respectively, while Unibase provided a comparison with Unibase alone. These comparisons were made for positive SPRs and rapid recovery SCRs (and their associated prestimulus levels), which are believed to reflect the endosomatic and exosomatic manifestations of the epidermal membrane response.Unibase/glycol was quite similar to glycol alone; thus it offers a more convenient electrolyte for use when minimal hydration is required. The results were interpreted as indicating that Unibase/glycol is preferable for skin potential recordings, while Unibase is to be preferred for skin conductance recordings.