Abstract

With fluorine as indicator, eight different extraction methods were tested for their suitability in geochemical prospecting for fluorite in stream sediments. Since this material can be regarded as coarse-grained, clastic fragments derived from the bedrock - i.e. granites, gneisses, and fluorite veins as well - it was concluded that the fluorine content of the stream sediments comes mostly from fluorine-bearing bedrock minerals. Anomalous samples contain fluorine predominantly as fluorite from fluorspar mineralization. Five of the commonest fluorine-bearing minerals - fluorite, mica, apatite, amphibole and tourmaline - were treated with the different extractants and with various times of reaction and mineral grain size. Fluorine analysis was by ion-selective electrode. The ratio cx-F (fluorite) vs. cx-F (mica, apatite) was found to be a useful measure of the applicability of the respective method. In order to test this conclusion 41 stream sediment samples ( −177 microns ≜ −80 mesh ) from the area under investigation were treated with eight different extractants. The most suitable extraction solution - boric acid solution - was used for the reconnaissance stream sediment survey in an area of 400 km 2 in the southeastern part of the Black Forest (F.R. Germany).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call