Abstract

As one kind of the legislative language, the language of bilingual legislation possesses its specific characteristics: the two versions share the same authenticity and effect. Therefore, the contrastive analysis of this kind of language from the perspective of pragmatics is more persuasive and authoritative. In this paper, the author chooses Crime Ordinance of Hong Kong and its subsidiary regulation Suppression of Piracy Regulations as data to explore the similarities and differences in the realization methods of speech acts and the frequency of speech acts indicators between English and Chinese texts. The author hopes to find conversions and translations of the corresponding form in speech acts of bilingual legislation and provide references for legal translation between English and Chinese through this study.

Highlights

  • With the reunification of Hong Kong, the bilingual legislation of Hong Kong comes into people’s eyes

  • Based on the discussion of the speech acts in the English versions and Chinese versions respectively, the author will discuss the similarities and differences of the speech acts in both the English and Chinese versions

  • The author will discuss the problems occurring in the course of the contrastive study of the indicators in the two versions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the reunification of Hong Kong, the bilingual legislation of Hong Kong comes into people’s eyes. The author of the present study is interested in investigating and comparing the legal forces distributions in bilingual legislative texts of Hong Kong from the perspective of speech acts. Speech act theory is applied to analyze legal discourses by some scholars Such researches are conducted either merely on English legislative language (Habermas, 1981; Danet, 1985; Trosborg, 1991, 1995), or only on Chinese legislative language (Zhang, 2000; Cao, 2007, 2009). In the present study, the author tries to unveil the mystery of the bilingual legislative text of Hong Kong from the perspective of speech act theory

The Theoretical Perspectives of Speech Acts in Legal Context
Data Collection
Categories of Legislative Speech Acts and the Indicators of the Present Study
Choices of Strategies for Issuing Legislative Speech Acts
Discussion
Similarities
Findings
Differences
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.