Abstract

<p>Introduction is a significant part-genre of a research article (RA) since it functions to persuade the readership that their research topic has some significance, that there is space for new knowledge around the topic and that the writer can make a contribution to knowledge. Previous studies mainly focused on experienced English L1 and L2 published writers. Masters majoring in Chemical Engineering in China are highly motivated to publish English RAs in international journals due to the requirements for graduation, but to date no work investigates into the disparity between their English RA introductions (ERAIs) and that of high impact SCI journals in terms of generic structure. To fill this gap, drawing on Swales’ CARS model (1990, 2004), this study analyzed the ERAIs written by L1 Chinese masters majoring in chemical engineering and L1 English published writers of the same discipline with a focus on the generic structure. The findings show that the NES published writers employ much more moves than the Chinese student writers, especially Move 1 “establishing a territory” and Move 2 “establishing a niche”. Due to the lack of Move 2, the completeness of the general organization of ERAIs written by the Chinese student writers is much weaker than the NES published writers. From the perspective of the constituent steps, the findings show that the lack of Move 1-Step 3 causes the overall insufficiency of Move 1 in the student writer group (SWG) compared with the published writer group (PWG) and the inadequate Step 1A “indicating a gap” leads to the overall deficiency of Move 2 in SWG. In Move 3, Step 1 is most frequently used in both groups. Although Step 5 and Step 6 are employed in this move but their frequency is low and quite similar to each other in these two groups. The findings have some pedagogical implication on the teaching of writing ERAIs.</p>

Highlights

  • With the exchange between different scholars in the international scientific academia becoming increasingly frequent, English research article (RA) have become a major channel for distributing academic ideas and advancing scientific knowledge among members of the international scientific research communities

  • Due to the lack of Move 2, the completeness of the general organization of English RA introductions (ERAIs) written by the Chinese student writers is much weaker than the native English speaking (NES) published writers

  • From the perspective of the constituent steps, the findings show that the lack of Move 1-Step 3 causes the overall insufficiency of Move 1 in the student writer group (SWG) compared with the published writer group (PWG) and the inadequate Step 1A “indicating a gap” leads to the overall deficiency of Move 2 in SWG

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the exchange between different scholars in the international scientific academia becoming increasingly frequent, English RAs have become a major channel for distributing academic ideas and advancing scientific knowledge among members of the international scientific research communities. Introduction is a significant “part-genre” (Dudley-Evans, 2000) since it achieves the key communicative purpose of “creating a research space in a particular research field” 229), and influence the acceptability of the article by international journals. For researchers, especially the non-native English speaking (NNES) researchers highly motivated to publish articles in international journals, it is indispensable to master this particular part-genre in terms of its generic structure which are acceptable to the international discourse community where the researchers belong. Since the proposal of the seminal Create a Research Space (CARS) Model for RA introductions by Swales in 1990, research article introductions have received special attention from researchers as well as teachers focusing on English academic writing. Scholars have applied the CARS model to ERAIs for various purposes: (1)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call