Abstract
When making sourcing decisions, many firms consider only the direct and most visible supply-chain costs, such as unit production costs and ocean-shipping costs. Often ignored are the hidden direct and indirect costs in long supply chains, and their impact on profitability. As supply chains lengthen, supply-chain disruptions undercut the ability of manufacturers and retailers to satisfy market demands. Supply-chain disruptions add costs by forcing companies to increase inventories, to juggle production and shipping schedules, to incur excessive backordering, and to airfreight or discount the prices of goods that were not in the right place at the right time. The question is, can higher incidence of supply-chain disruptions in intercontinental supply chains justify keeping the domestic suppliers? To address the question, this paper presents a hybrid continuous-review inventory model for dual intercontinental and domestic outsourcing. The conditions for domestic outsourcing only, for intercontinental outsourcing, and for dual outsourcing were established. The problem of minimising the long-run average cost of outsourcing was investigated, and mathematical optimisation was used to illustrate the model. It is shown that if the cost of service failure outweighs the cost differential between domestic and intercontinental outsourcing, keeping domestic suppliers may be a good option.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.