Abstract

This study sought answers related to the distribution of colour terms in Persian poems and their metaphoric reflection in poets' beliefs, ideas, or values. In so doing, 137 Persian verses from two poetry books with colour terms in content were considered for the analysis. Four raters who studied literature of Persian scrutinized the verses for the evaluation of the colour metaphoric conceptualizations. To validate the raters' suggestions, a focus group of sixteen commented on the recommended connotations. Results indicated that colours are not similarly distributed in Persian poems, are used with different conceptualizations and stood for both positive and negative connotations. Therefore, since colours are part of the authors' and speakers' daily lives to express information, knowledge of metaphoric expressions is suggested to be an inseparable part of language classes.

Highlights

  • For many years, scholars have been examining how metaphorical expressions connect to their cognitive geneses (Lakoff/Johnson 1980a, 1980b; Gibbs 1994; Fauconnier/Turner 1998; Forceville 2002; Goddard 2004)

  • Due to scarcity of studies accomplished on the use, frequency and distribution of conceptual metaphor of colours across languages in general and Persian in particular, the present study investigated the conceptual metaphor of colours in poems to figure out the frequent colours and the common conceptualizations those colours signify in Persian

  • To what extent are the poet's beliefs, ideas, or values reflected in the use of colour metaphors?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scholars have been examining how metaphorical expressions connect to their cognitive geneses (Lakoff/Johnson 1980a, 1980b; Gibbs 1994; Fauconnier/Turner 1998; Forceville 2002; Goddard 2004). Conceptual metaphor refers to the understanding of an abstract concept, called the target domain, in terms of a concrete concept of which one can have direct sensory experience, namely the source domain. This underlying association between the two domains is held to be systematic in both language and thought (Babarczy/Bencze/Fekete/Simon 2010: 1).

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.