Abstract

Abstract. Many environmental systems models, such as conceptual rainfall-runoff models, rely on model calibration for parameter identification. For this, an observed output time series (such as runoff) is needed, but frequently not available (e.g., when making predictions in ungauged basins). In this study, we provide an alternative approach for parameter identification using constraints based on two types of restrictions derived from prior (or expert) knowledge. The first, called parameter constraints, restricts the solution space based on realistic relationships that must hold between the different model parameters while the second, called process constraints requires that additional realism relationships between the fluxes and state variables must be satisfied. Specifically, we propose a search algorithm for finding parameter sets that simultaneously satisfy such constraints, based on stepwise sampling of the parameter space. Such parameter sets have the desirable property of being consistent with the modeler's intuition of how the catchment functions, and can (if necessary) serve as prior information for further investigations by reducing the prior uncertainties associated with both calibration and prediction.

Highlights

  • Environmental systems models, such as conceptual rainfallrunoff (CRR) models, are abstract simplifications of real system behavior

  • One of the most challenging tasks in the development of complex conceptual hydrological models for simulation of catchment responses to inputs is the realistic specification of parameter values

  • We have presented a constraint-based search strategy that facilitates the incorporation of expert knowledge into the parameter specification process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental systems models, such as conceptual rainfallrunoff (CRR) models, are abstract simplifications of real system behavior. Any model result that implies peak flows are composed of a strong groundwater response should be discarded or should be given low importance An example of such an approach toward modeling was mentioned by Götzinger and Bárdossy (2007), where they impose the Lipschitz and monotonic conditions to avoid the abrupt jump in soil moisture values for the neighboring cells of a distributed model based on the physical premises that such jumps are numerical artifacts and hydrologically unrealistic. Such kinds of information, which are not explicitly provided during model calibration, act as constraints to limit the feasible extent of the model parameter space, resulting in physically more meaningful model simulations. The approach is applicable to both lumped/semi-distributed and spatially distributed catchment models

Constraints in environmental models
Parameter constraints
Process constraints
Case study
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call