Abstract

Cytoplasmic dynein is the major minus-end-directed microtubule-based motor in cells. Dynein processivity and cargo selectivity depend on cargo-specific effectors that, while generally unrelated, share the ability to interact with dynein and dynactin to form processive dynein–dynactin-effector complexes. How this is achieved is poorly understood. Here, we identify a conserved region of the dynein Light Intermediate Chain 1 (LIC1) that mediates interactions with unrelated dynein–dynactin effectors. Quantitative binding studies map these interactions to a conserved helix within LIC1 and to N-terminal fragments of Hook1, Hook3, BICD2, and Spindly. A structure of the LIC1 helix bound to the N-terminal Hook domain reveals a conformational change that creates a hydrophobic cleft for binding of the LIC1 helix. The LIC1 helix competitively inhibits processive dynein–dynactin-effector motility in vitro, whereas structure-inspired mutations in this helix impair lysosomal positioning in cells. The results reveal a conserved mechanism of effector interaction with dynein–dynactin necessary for processive motility.

Highlights

  • Cytoplasmic dynein is the major minus-end-directed microtubule-based motor in cells

  • We show that a conserved amphipathic helix within the unstructured Cterminal region of the dynein Light Intermediate Chain 1 (LIC1) interacts with diverse dynein–dynactin effectors

  • Supporting the importance of the LIC1-effector interaction, we found that the LIC1 helix competitively inhibits the processive motility of dynein–dynactin in complex with either Hook[3] or BICD2 in single-molecule assays using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cytoplasmic dynein is the major minus-end-directed microtubule-based motor in cells. Dynein processivity and cargo selectivity depend on cargo-specific effectors that, while generally unrelated, share the ability to interact with dynein and dynactin to form processive dynein–dynactin-effector complexes. Recent work has shown that both cargo-specificity and processivity depend on the interaction of dynein with its general adaptor, the dynactin complex, and a series of cargo-specific effectors, including BICD25–7, Hook1/35,8,9, Spindly[5], FIP35 and NIN/NINL10. These proteins are generally unrelated at the sequence level, but they all contain large portions of predicted coiled-coil structure and share the ability to interact with both dynein and dynactin to activate processive motility[5,6,8,10,11]. The results reveal the existence of a conserved mechanism of interaction between functionally unrelated dynein–dynactin effectors and the dynein LIC1, which is required for processive dynein-driven transport

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call