Abstract

For core financial market activities like risk management and asset pricing, it appears to be crucial to investigate the “connectedness” among financial institutions. In times of economic crises, a suitable measure of connectedness can provide valuable insights of financial markets and helps to understand how institutions influence each other. In particular, depending on contractual obligations between financial institutions, the financial distress at a bank with large systemic impact is likely to cause also distress at other institutions. In the literature, the latter phenomenon is generally tagged by ’contagion’ and can eventually result in severe economic crises. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the connectedness among German financial institutions during the global financial crisis 2007-2009, where the authors focus particularly on 2008 and its height in September 2008 with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. They make use of the definition of connectedness, as it was recently proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2014). Their approach relies on analyzing multiple time series of volatilities by a vector autoregressive (VAR) model and a generalized forecast error variance decompositions. It provides several meaningful measures of connectedness and allows for static (average), as well as dynamic (daily time-varying) analyses. The authors show that the connectedness in Germany can be described well by the model. Keywords: сonnectedness, contagion, generalized variance decomposition, networks, spillover effects. JEL Classification: C32, C58, G32, G33

Highlights

  • One central aspect of modern risk management is to analyze the interdependence of certain actors on the financial market

  • The Basel Committee comments on the risk of contagion in a market as follows (Basel Commitee on Banking Supervision, 2011, p. 7): “Financial distress at one institution can materially raise the likelihood of distress at other institutions given the network of contractual obligations in which these firms operate

  • We provide several versions of volatility connectedness that help to understand the interplay between financial institutions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One central aspect of modern risk management is to analyze the interdependence of certain actors on the financial market. We use the popular concept of connectedness, as it has been recently proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012, 2014, 2015) Their approach relies on analyzing multiple time series of volatilities by a vector autoregressive (VAR) model and to measure connectedness in several ways based on forecast error variance decompositions. Their concept allows the definition of several natural and insightful measures of connectedness among financial asset returns and volatilities. The contribution of this paper is to measure and analyze the connectedness among financial firms in Germany at various levels based on the approach of Diebold und Yilmaz (2014).

The methodology of connectedness
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.