A Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Weather Radar Beam Blockage Correction

Abstract

Missing or low-quality data regions usually happen to weather radars. One of the most common situations is beam blockage or partial beam blockage. Therefore, correction of weather radar observations that are partially or fully blocked is an indispensable step in radar data quality control and subsequent quantitative applications, especially in complex terrain environments such as the western United States. In this article, we propose a deep learning framework based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) for restoring partial beam blockage regions in polarimetric radar observations using local and global contextual information. Due to the diverse precipitation types, blockage conditions, and ground information in different areas, two radars deployed in two different regions characterized by different precipitation types are used to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Both are S-band operational Weather Surveillance Radar – 1988 Doppler (WSR-88D): KFWS located in Fort Worth, northern Texas, and KDAX located in Davis, northern California. For training the GAN model, this article simulates the partial beam blockage situations by manually cropping observation sectors of both KDAX and KFWS radar data. The trained models were tested using independent precipitation events in Texas and California to demonstrate the model effectiveness in inpainting “missing" data. In addition, this paper cross-tested the data with different precipitation features to examine the generalization capacity of the beam blockage correction models. The beam blockage correction performance is also compared with a traditional linear interpolation approach. The results show that for both domains the continuity of precipitation observations is greatly improved after applying the deep learning-based inpainting approach. For the KFWS test data, some visible discrepancies exist between the results from models trained based on convective and stratiform precipitation events in Texas and California, respectively, yet both models outperform the traditional interpolation method. For the KDAX test data, both the model trained using the KFWS data from convective precipitation events in Texas and the model trained using KDAX data from stratiform precipitation events in California render a similar performance. Although ground truth is not available for the real blocked radar data, the repaired observations demonstrated a great potential for improved quantitative applications.