Abstract

In order to manage the worrying predicament of declining global birth rates, a majority of higher-education institutions have commenced to institute a series of diversified strategies in order to make higher-education sustainability count. The aim of this research is to present the results of a study with the goal of helping educational institutions achieve their sustainability. As a succession of quantitative and qualitative analyses and measurements, there are four valuable and contributive findings in this research. First, total tuition and miscellaneous revenues (TTMR), total university–industry cooperative revenues (TUCIR) and total grants from government (TGG) of higher-education governance (HEG) were able to directly and effectively increase higher-education sustainable value. This definitively indicates that current higher-education students and staff, as well as higher-education experts and professionals, indeed agree that the tuition and miscellaneous fees, university–industry cooperative, and government grant revenues have become the most critical determinants of university environment social governance (UESG). This is because the majority of higher-education institutions do need these revenue resources to advance a succession of environmental protections, social responsibilities, and governance performance for current higher-education institution sustainability development. Second, comprehensive scale of QS rankings (CS-QS) was the most important key determinant to evaluate the university social responsibility development (USRD), which means the majority of higher-education institutions have to pay more attention on the comprehensive scale of QS rankings (CS-QS) in order to make more sustainability count. The third finding is the number of student’s publications (NSP), which was the most crucial key determinant to assay return on investments (ROI), meaning current higher-education students, staff, experts, and professionals consent to higher-education institutions having to establish an evaluated system for student’s publications to stimulate students to publish their diversified studying outcomes in order to make students recognize their growth after taking courses in higher education. The last finding is total tuition and miscellaneous revenues (TTMR) was the most momentous key determinant to control high education governance (HEG), which means current higher-education students, staff, experts, and professionals are concerned with the various governance performances of their tuition and miscellaneous fees. As for the future direction, there are still some evaluated criteria and assessed methods to be comprehensively considered and employed for inducing in-depth conclusions and findings with higher research reliability and validity without time limitations and resource restrictions.

Highlights

  • According to the latest annual largescope report from the Ministry of Labor for investigating changing jobs and those willing to work overseas, are approximately 737,000 Taiwanese working in transoceanic jobs, but up to 87.8% of 3000 Taiwanese interviewees are willing to continue applying to overseas positions in Japan, America, and countries in ASEAN

  • The majority of companies have taken a bulk of noncommercial activities of corporate social responsibility (CSR), and they have started to consider the various measurements of these activities in order to comprehensively assess and manage these activities for exposing the positive influence of these activities to companies and the entire society

  • These are (1) Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) which is a global provider of equity, fixed income, hedge fund stock-market indexes, multi-asset portfolio analysis tools, and environment social governance (ESG) products by means of publishing the MSCI BRIC, MSCI World, and MSCI EAFE Indexes, located in New York City, United States; (2) Morningstar, which is an American financial services to offer an array of investment research and investment management services, located in Chicago, Illinois, United States since 1984; and (3) the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)

Read more

Summary

A Concretizing Research on Making Higher-Education

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Introduction
Literature on Main Modern Concepts
Factor Analysis of Quantitative Analysis
Analytical Network Process of Qualitative Analysis
Questionnaire Collection
Questionnaire Interviewees
Main Research Criteria
Main Research Process
FA Systematic Approach of Quantitative Analysis
1: Female
ANP Hierarchical Model of Qualitative Analysis
Findings
Conclusions and Recommendations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.