A concept for data-driven uncertainty quantification and its application to carbon dioxide storage in geological formations

Abstract

Model-based uncertainty analysis can help to judge the potentials and hazard in many engineering applications better. This requires to specify the probability distributions of all model parameters, posing a huge demand on data availability or requiring highly subjective assumptions on distribution shapes to compensate for missing data. We present a minimally subjective approach for uncertainty quantification in data-sparse situations, based on a new and purely data-driven version of polynomial chaos expansion (PCE). It avoids the subjectivity that is otherwise introduced when choosing among a small limited number of theoretical distribution shapes to represent natural phenomena: we only demand the existence of a finite number of statistical moments, and do not require knowledge or even the existence of probability density functions for input parameters. In a small fictitious example with independent experts, otherwise, we demonstrate that this subjectivity can easily lead to substantial prediction bias, and that the subjective choice of distribution shapes has a similar relevance as uncertainties due to physical conceptualization, numerical codes and parameter uncertainty. With our approach we can directly and most flexibly use raw data sets available from global databases or soft information from experts in the form of arbitrary distributions or statistical moments. We illustrate and validate our proposed approach by a comparison with a Monte Carlo simulation using a common 3D benchmark problem for CO 2 injection, which is a low-parametric homogeneous system. We obtain a significant computational speed-up compared with Monte Carlo as well as high accuracy even for small orders of expansion, and show how our novel approach helps overcome subjectivity.