Abstract

The policies and procedures adopted by the Biological Monitoring Working Party in developing its score system are summarised. The conceptual basis of the reappraisal is described and then formulated mathematically. The analysis is based on some 17,000 biological samples and covers 85 families. The results are expressed in terms of derived scores which mirror the scores allocated to the families by the BMWP. Some of the differences between the derived and original scores are quite substantial, and are shown to relate to policies and practices adopted by the Working Party. It is argued that the derived scores offer a more realistic representation of the families' sensitivities to pollution than do the BMWP scores. The most significant differences are discussed in relation to their likely causes and are shown to be consistent with expectations. It is concluded that the system's poor performance in some recent tests may be explained by these findings, and that corrective action could improve performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.